[unoino]

These two guys were thrownout for no reason whatsoever victims of mob rule.Jeremy touched (drama queen) Chloes dressing gown..when she was in room alone..a nude model..gown half open..tits in his face..and he was pissed..to think he was gonna b charged with infecent assault is unbelievable...and the plan for Chloe worked even cryin crocodile tears...Shel make a great Pinnochio at Christmas...Luckily the public felt exactly the same and saw through her "cry wolfe" antics...Then theres Ken..he called Alex Negro and repeated a story how it was with the word negro in..Why oh why was ge thrown out..Negro isnt an illegal word..its not on a list of racist dos /donts...yet he had to go too...Its time Ch5 listened to the vast majority of people in the Uk in workplace /pubs /clubs..college Universities...stating that these two victims didnt deserve to go...and we all know Ch5 regret there stance..but they made that decision at the time due mostly to the pc savvy gang who were ruling by mob rule...The public have proved by evicting (drama queen) Chloe that it was totally wrong to evict Jeremy...so give them both a chance...SEND THEM BACK IN...

[Josy]

They were thrown out for very obvious reasons.

[Liam-]

No thank you

[unoino]

Here we go...the reasons were obvious...we know that...but punishment was unfair massively

[the truth]

yes bring them back, I agree it was mob rule. ken said he liked womens arse and used the word negro twice in telling an anecdote, he did NOT call anyone that word. Jeremy was sick and drunk and should have been left in the toilet privately , not to have 4 women enter there, 1 who was naked under a robe , invading his space. yes he touched the small strings att he top of the robe and her boob spilled out. did he know she was naked underneath? no. total over reaction ,now hes labelled a sex pest to millions across the globe. absurd.

[zakman440]

[arista]

Originally Posted by zakman440

She is Sexy

[Samm]

lol no

[LukeB]

Jeremy yes. Ken no