[Crimson Dynamo]

I dont want them searching Kirks Internet History and then arresting a load of Dwarf Shemales in a dawn raid

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I dont want them searching Kirks Internet History and then arresting a load of Dwarf Shemales in a dawn raid

It's only if they're wearing burka's when I'll be in trouble though LT.

[arista]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

To save me Googling - WTF is The Dark Net -- I thought it was something fictional that they tried to snare Darth Vader with.

Traders of Illegal Gear
Criminals that can not be tracked

They Use BitCoin alot

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by arista

Traders of Illegal Gear
Criminals that can not be tracked

They Use BitCoin alot

Thanks Arista - I learn something every day.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I dont want them searching Kirks Internet History and then arresting a load of Dwarf Shemales in a dawn raid

What??

Dwarf shemales are illegal??

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

I have experience in that field, so i am not misinformed.

If you're pointing out that the darkweb can be accessed unencrypted (when usually it isn't, but it can be) then just say that. If you are trying to say that ISP's can monitor and log specific online activity via a properly encrypted connection without some serious extra legwork such as a team of highly skilled people specifically targetting that data... then you ARE misinformed, whether you have experience in that field or not.

[Ninastar]

This is good tbh. It will help the police find out more info when dealing with online bullying, hacking, terrorism, etc etc.

I didnt realise they weren't allowed to do so before...

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Chaos

This is good tbh. It will help the police find out more info when dealing with online bullying, hacking, terrorism, etc etc.

I didnt realise they weren't allowed to do so before...

Yeah it's great - almost as good as in 2017, when they're going to be putting CCTV into every home. It will really help the police when dealing with domestic violence issues so why would anyone have a problem with it?

[DemolitionRed]

Demolition Man Language violation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz4HEEiJuGo

[Jack_]

Three pages in and not a sign of 'if you've nothing to hide, you've nothing to fear'?

Wow, maybe people finally became self-aware of the irony of posting such a statement on a Big Brother forum.

[kirklancaster]

I don't know what all the fuss is about really; If you've nothing to fear then you have obviousy nothing to hide.

Spoiler:

Sorry Jack - Couldn't resist.

[waterhog]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I don't know what all the fuss is about really; If you've nothing to fear then you have obviousy nothing to hide.

Spoiler:

Sorry Jack - Couldn't resist.

you better delete them naughty emails you sent me kirky - don't worry I wont tell a sole.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I don't know what all the fuss is about really; If you've nothing to fear then you have obviousy nothing to hide.

Spoiler:

Sorry Jack - Couldn't resist.

That should be the case,however over zealous Police activity has been responsible for people being accused of things they haven't done before and down to other members of the public too.

It indeed would be wonderful for all who have done nothing illegal to have no fear of the authorities but if authority is not properly checked then big mistakes can come about.
Even for a time to the innocent.

[arista]

[The shelved Communications Data Bill - labelled a ''snooper's charter'' by critics - would have required
companies to retain phone and email data to include records of browsing activity, social media use and
internet gaming, among other things.
It was blocked by the Liberal Democrats due to privacy concerns during the coalition government
but the forthcoming Investigatory Powers Bill could revive the measures.
Tory MP David Davis told The Times: "It's extraordinary they're asking for this again,
they are overreaching and there is no proven need to retain such data for a year."]


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015...ukhpmg00000001

[arista]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Demolition Man Language violation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz4HEEiJuGo

Fecking Ace

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Demolition Man Language violation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz4HEEiJuGo

Did I spy Sir Humphrey Appleby.... How very apt.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Did I spy Sir Humphrey Appleby.... How very apt.

[bots]

Theresa May rules out keeping web browsing data

Security agencies will not be given powers to look at a suspect's website browsing history under new laws, Home Secretary Theresa May has said.
She also told the BBC that companies would not be banned from encrypting data, as she prepares to present a new security bill to Parliament this week.
The bill will allow agencies to see who has spoken to whom, and when.
Former head of GCHQ Sir David Omand has called for internet firms to be forced by law to keep users' browsing history.
He said such data was not for spying on the public but to see "for example, whether a suspect has downloaded a terrorist manual".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34691956

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Theresa May rules out keeping web browsing data

Security agencies will not be given powers to look at a suspect's website browsing history under new laws, Home Secretary Theresa May has said.
She also told the BBC that companies would not be banned from encrypting data, as she prepares to present a new security bill to Parliament this week.
The bill will allow agencies to see who has spoken to whom, and when.
Former head of GCHQ Sir David Omand has called for internet firms to be forced by law to keep users' browsing history.
He said such data was not for spying on the public but to see "for example, whether a suspect has downloaded a terrorist manual".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34691956

Thanks for this BitOnTheSlide it certainly puts a new slant on it.

[arista]

Yes its still not even debated in Parliament

[Kizzy]

I got the impression MPs were more worried than the public, they were all for it until they found out it meant them too.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes its still not even debated in Parliament

She was likely going to face more hassle and defeat in the Lords, that is the reason she is dropping a lot of it.
What a waste of time and space this woman is.

However I am glad they are failing in this again,more badly thought out nonsense from them.

[Kizzy]

Half of me thinks many of these proposals are merely smokescreens for other issues. If we say x they won't notice z....

[T*]

'what the **** is this is big brother?'

[Ryan57]

The bill has now been revealed. Info here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34719569