[arista]

He was just debated Live on USA News
He hunts game so of course he has Guns.


He also stated its no time to lay down our guns
(thats for all you anti gun tibb posters)


[‘Of course I have guns. And I shoot them.
This is no time to lay down your weapons':
Kurt Russell on self-protection,
kicking Elvis and not marrying Goldie]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/even...#ixzz3vgD1hT00

America is No longer our nation
let them be free.

[kirklancaster]

Great article Arista.

I love Kurt Russell and he is absolutely correct in what he says.

[Mystic Mock]

If he wants civilians lives to be endanger just so he can have Guns for "Sport" then I seriously hope that he never gets to experience the loss of a friend or a family member like so many Americans have to do every single day in that country due to being shot to death.

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by Father Mockmas

If he wants civilians lives to be endanger just so he can have Guns for "Sport" then I seriously hope that he never gets to experience the loss of a friend or a family member like so many Americans have to do every single day in that country due to being shot to death.

I agree. It's undeniable how many innocent people are shot dead because of the second amendment. Of course there are arguments for gun ownership and there will be the rare occasion where someone somewhere needs to defend themselves, but in reality, the right to bear arms brings far more harm than good imo.

[kirklancaster]

We have no '2nd amendment' here, but our gun crimes are escalating year in year out.

Criminals, and psycopaths do not NEED any permit to obtain, carry, and use guns, and would certainly ignore any law prohibiting them from possessing or using guns, and though current US gun laws undoubtedly make it easier for those who perpetrate gun crimes, repeal of the '2nd Amendment' would NOT prevent the greater majority of such gun crimes from ocurring.

Another thing to carefully ponder, is this:

Would the death toll of innocents have been as high as 17 in the horrific Dunblane school massacre back in 1996, if the teacher had access to a firearm and knew how to use it?

Would the horrific death toll of the Paris Bataclan theatre have been as high as 89 if just SOME of those innocent theatre goers or Security Staff had been carrying weapons?

The great irony of Law, is that it is only ever adhered to by the lawful and never by the lawless, so criminals and psychotics are never going to be deterred by any laws.

[Kizzy]

His civil war reference is surprising, is this an admission of confederacy?

[arista]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Great article Arista.

I love Kurt Russell and he is absolutely correct in what he says.

Yes it was Debated last night on FoxNewsHD

[Northern Monkey]

Good old Kurt

[Kazanne]

Sorry,but the fact that he hunts animals is enough to put me off him big time.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Tinselbells

Sorry,but the fact that he hunts animals is enough to put me off him big time.

We Eat chickens they get Hurt to get on my table
its been like that for Thousands of years

[Livia]

Originally Posted by arista

We Eat chickens they get Hurt to get on my table
its been like that for Thousands of years

If I thought for one moment he eats what he hunts then I'd agree with you. But I would lay a month's salary that he doesn't, so the chicken analogy is flawed. And of course, chickens aren't generally hunted in wild.

The right to bear arms is as archaic as the right to keep slaves. It wouldn't be so bad if people were allowed one pistol or one rifle or one shotgun, I live in the countryside, everyone around here has a shotgun including me. But that's not enough. They can, perfectly legally, own a whole arsenal of military-standard automatic weapons which is just so stupid I don't have enough words to condemn it.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Livia

If I thought for one moment he eats what he hunts then I'd agree with you. But I would lay a month's salary that he doesn't, so the chicken analogy is flawed. And of course, chickens aren't generally hunted in wild.

The right to bear arms is as archaic as the right to keep slaves. It wouldn't be so bad if people were allowed one pistol or one rifle or one shotgun, I live in the countryside, everyone around here has a shotgun including me. But that's not enough. They can, perfectly legally, own a whole arsenal of military-standard automatic weapons which is just so stupid I don't have enough words to condemn it.

As a matter of interest Livia why do you own a shot gun?

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Cherie Christmas

As a matter of interest Livia why do you own a shot gun?

Because I like to shoot clays. You know, clay pigeon.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Livia

Because I like to shoot clays. You know, clay pigeon.

You Are Most Wise Livia

[arista]

Originally Posted by Livia

If I thought for one moment he eats what he hunts then I'd agree with you. But I would lay a month's salary that he doesn't, so the chicken analogy is flawed. And of course, chickens aren't generally hunted in wild.

The right to bear arms is as archaic as the right to keep slaves. It wouldn't be so bad if people were allowed one pistol or one rifle or one shotgun, I live in the countryside, everyone around here has a shotgun including me. But that's not enough. They can, perfectly legally, own a whole arsenal of military-standard automatic weapons which is just so stupid I don't have enough words to condemn it.

Ofcourse Chickens on Not Hunted today
they are Factory Farmed
but if I went back in time
the Chickens were Much Larger
those were hunted .


Life In The City

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Tinselbells

Sorry,but the fact that he hunts animals is enough to put me off him big time.

agree

disgusting pig

[lostalex]

The British Royal Family owns guns don't they?

If it's good enough for the Queen it's good enough for me.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Just don't do a blackface, Kurt.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Livia

Because I like to shoot clays. You know, clay pigeon.

Ok just wondered

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Cherie Christmas

Ok just wondered

Hell Cherie - Liv's LYING her pretty head off. That shotgun's there for any uninvited HUMAN guests, God help 'em

[arista]

Originally Posted by lostalex

The British Royal Family owns guns don't they?

If it's good enough for the Queen it's good enough for me.

Yes all of them
are under lock and key when not in use.


But you have a Solid Point - Alex
if that old bird can shoot Game
then all others that are Responsible can as well

[Livia]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Hell Cherie - Liv's LYING her pretty head off. That shotgun's there for any uninvited HUMAN guests, God help 'em

If someone broke in, by the time I'd got to the locked cabinet, unlocked it, taken the gun out, got the cartridges from a locked drawer, loaded it... they'd have probably ransacked the place or murdered me.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Livia

If someone broke in, by the time I'd got to the locked cabinet, unlocked it, taken the gun out, got the cartridges from a locked drawer, loaded it... they'd have probably ransacked the place or murdered me.

It serves you right - You snubbed my offer of me living in your garden shed to watch over you and protect you.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Tinselbells

Sorry,but the fact that he hunts animals is enough to put me off him big time.

Yeah, Kaz - I detest all bloodsports and my pet hate in this country is Fox Hunting. That part of Kurt's article I do not agree with.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

If someone broke in, by the time I'd got to the locked cabinet, unlocked it, taken the gun out, got the cartridges from a locked drawer, loaded it... they'd have probably ransacked the place or murdered me.

Not after you've rugby tackled them and tied them to a chair... Right?

"Why are his exploded remains mixed with splinters of chair and rope? Umm... Honest ossifer, he was trying to steal that chair, he had strapped it to himself with the rope and was charging at me with knives! "