[BigBrother2012-2016]

I watched the preview for it on Sunday afternoon and heard Big Brother say "You must reach a unanimous vote and only the person being evicted will be able to disagree", I thought to myself... This is gonna be good because everyone has their own pal ect so there's going to be alot of discussion and arguing to save their friends.

And then Jackson went and spouted his mouth off and i knew someone was gonna pipe up and say "well let's just vote and whoever gets the most leaves"... I could've predicted Chelsea would've gotten evicted this way and they might as well had just nominated. The whole point of the game has been ruined.

[Jack_]

One thing I thought was interesting is that surely several of the remarks of 'if I were in the DR nominating I'd have gone for ... so...' constitute a rule break since they never actually permitted them to discuss nominations per se, just come up with a unanimous decision?

[BigBrother2012-2016]

Originally Posted by Jack_

One thing I thought was interesting is that surely several of the remarks of 'if I were in the DR nominating I'd have gone for ... so...' constitute a rule break since they never actually permitted them to discuss nominations per se, just come up with a unanimous decision?

Yes! I never thought about the rule breaks however big brother probably made an exception considering the circumstances. I just wish it would've turned into a fight for survival and groups sticking up for themselves rather then rolling over and letting Jackson decide.

[mysargasso]

I have to say I was surprised at just how quick Lateysha was at throwing in the white flag of defeat after Jackson took over at pretty much convinced everyone to give Andy immunity. I thought our girl had more of a fight in her tbh.

I wish BB would pipe in and remind the housemates that it's a UNANIMOUS and NOT a MAJORITY decision. If even ONE housemate has a different answer than the majority of the group, the jury is still technically out.