About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

By forcing them to suck dick and measure their brain waves obviously.

So you have no proof then.

Colour me surprised.

Marsh. · 03-08-2016, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Given that you earlier asked me to prove an opinion, I don't think that you know the difference.

Biggins claimed that bisexuals were actually gay. How do you prove that wrong?

Except that's not an opinion, it's a statement of fact. Facts require evidence.

Marsh. · 03-08-2016, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

So you have no proof then.

Colour me surprised.

The onus isn't on me to prove anything.

Rob! · 03-08-2016, 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Given that you earlier asked me to prove an opinion, I don't think that you know the difference.

Biggins claimed that bisexuals were actually gay. How do you prove that wrong?

Because bisexual means being attracted to both genders whilst gay means being attracted to a single gender? The proof is in the definition of the words... Otherwise bisexuality would be called "stillabitintheclosestlity."

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Except that's not an opinion, it's a statement of fact. Facts require evidence.

No he offered it as his opinion. He knows, as I do, that no actual proof can be found either way.

Marsh. · 03-08-2016, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

No he offered it as his opinion. He knows, as I do, that no actual proof can be found either way.

Yes, because people who are bisexual can't be seen or heard so we can only imagine what they would and wouldn't be like.

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The onus isn't on me to prove anything.

Great, so you are happy to allow biggins to carry on having his opinion.

Glad we got that sorted.

Rob! · 03-08-2016, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

No he offered it as his opinion. He knows, as I do, that no actual proof can be found either way.

So what would you call somebody who is attracted to both genders? I really don't understand why this is something you feel you can create any sort of debate about?
Biggins is wrong. He has an outdated view on sexuality. It's as simple as that:

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob!

So what would you call somebody who is attracted to both genders? I really don't understand why this is something you feel you can create any sort of debate about?
Biggins is wrong. He has an outdated view on sexuality. It's as simple as that:

He doesn't believe they are attracted to both genders. That's the point.

Marsh. · 03-08-2016, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

He doesn't believe they are attracted to both genders.

Based on what?

Rob! · 03-08-2016, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

He doesn't believe they are attracted to both genders. That's the point.

Exactly. So he's wrong. Where is there debate on that?

bots · 03-08-2016, 01:58 AM

Biggins made a generalisation, and by definition, a generalisation is inherently inaccurate, with a high probability of error. It doesn't mean he was wrong, just not very accurate.

Marsh. · 03-08-2016, 01:58 AM

I could say I think all straight men are actually repulsed by vaginas and only pretend to like them. Doesn't make that "opinion" in anyway accurate.

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Based on what?

Gee, I dunno. Perhaps his experience as being a gay man on the gay scene for the last 50 years, plus being married to a woman himself to disguise it.

It is his opinion. It doesn't need to be based on anything. He doesn't have to justify it and it isn't "wrong" because you say so.

Rob! · 03-08-2016, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Gee, I dunno. Perhaps his experience as being a gay man on the gay scene for the last 50 years, plus being married to a woman himself to disguise it.

It is his opinion. It doesn't need to be based on anything. He doesn't have to justify it and it isn't "wrong" because you say so.

It's not an opinion though. You used the word yourself - it's his experience.

Marsh. · 03-08-2016, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Perhaps his experience as being a gay man on the gay scene for the last 50 years, plus being married to a woman himself to disguise it..

The experience of a gay man hiding his sexuality doesn't have anything to do with bisexuality though?

You could just as easily say his experience as a gay man marrying a woman proves all married men actually love cock.

The logic here is actually laughable.

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob!

Exactly. So he's wrong. Where is there debate on that?

He is wrong in your opinion.

Your opinion simply differs from his.

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The experience of a gay man hiding his sexuality doesn't have anything to do with bisexuality though?

You could just as easily say his experience as a gay man marrying a woman proves all married men actually love cock.

The logic here is actually laughable.

He isn't making any logical points or deductions. He just feels that bisexuals aren't being honest. Let him have his opinion in this free country.

Rob! · 03-08-2016, 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

He isn't making any logical points or deductions..

Who'd have thought you'd have something in common with Christopher Biggins?

Rob! · 03-08-2016, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

He is wrong in your opinion.

Your opinion simply differs from his.

It's not an opinion though and you've had that said to you on numerous occasions now.

empire · 03-08-2016, 02:05 AM

biggins is from the old school gay generation that have some black and white views on things,

ThriceShy · 03-08-2016, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I could say I think all straight men are actually repulsed by vaginas and only pretend to like them. Doesn't make that "opinion" in anyway accurate.

Nobody is claiming he is accurate.

I don't know if he is right or not. It is his opinion. Simple as that. In the absence of actual proof, it is just a matter of opinion.