[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Without immigration we would have no homegrown terrorism. The more immigration the more home grown terrorism.

That is not true, immigration has no effect on radicalisation.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Livia

It's only a problem because it's the USA. No one's got a problem with Japan's policy and it's virtually the same as the USA only it's been in place longer.

But Japan didn't turn much of the Middle East into a dust bowl... America did.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Without immigration we would have no homegrown terrorism. The more immigration the more home grown terrorism.

Well that's just foolishness. In America, you're more likely to die to a terror attack carried out by a Right Wing extremist or a socially awkward white teenage boy that's mad at the world then you are at the hands of a muslim terrorist, homegrown or not.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

But Japan didn't turn much of the Middle East into a dust bowl... America did.

that is nonsense, what evidence have you got to make such a statement?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

It's only a problem because it's the USA. No one's got a problem with Japan's policy and it's virtually the same as the USA only it's been in place longer.

Nobody has an issue with outer mongolia either, the discussion is specifically related to the US. Why is there an issue keeping the focus on the US?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Livia

It's only a problem because it's the USA. No one's got a problem with Japan's policy and it's virtually the same as the USA only it's been in place longer.

Japan is not a country that preaches freedom in every single one of it's amendments. Japan wasn't built with the same priorities in mind, for a sizable chunk of it's history it was an isolationist country. To hold it to the same standards as the US is rather silly and ill-thought out.

The muslim ban is stamping over the liberties that the US constitution vowed to protect, it's there's states rebelling and blocking it and why Trump has resorted to threats of withholding funds for places that don't cave to his unconstitutional demands.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Japan is not a country that preaches freedom in every single one of it's amendments. Japan wasn't built with the same priorities in mind, for a sizable chunk of it's history it was an isolationist country. To hold it to the same standards as the US is rather silly and ill-thought out.

The muslim ban is stamping over the liberties that the US constitution vowed to protect, it's there's states rebelling and blocking it and why Trump has resorted to threats of withholding funds for places that don't cave to his unconstitutional demands.

its not a muslim ban and your insistence in calling it that undermines anything you say on it

sorry

[Tom4784]

Yes, let's not call the MUSLIM BAN a MUSLIM BAN although it targets muslim countries and it's people, with the exceptions of the countries Trump has business interests in. Let's just ignore the fact that the MUSLIM BAN was a term Trump came up and was a promise during his campaign, let's ignore the fact that Sean Spicer, the White House's representative to the press has called it a Muslim Ban before the White House went into full on damage control.

It it looks like a MUSLIM BAN. sounds like a MUSLIM BAN then it probably is a MUSLIM BAN

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Yes, let's not call the MUSLIM BAN a MUSLIM BAN although it targets muslim countries and it's people, with the exceptions of the countries Trump has business interests in. Let's just ignore the fact that the MUSLIM BAN was a term Trump came up and was a promise during his campaign, let's ignore the fact that Sean Spicer, the White House's representative to the press has called it a Muslim Ban before the White House went into full on damage control.

It it looks like a MUSLIM BAN. sounds like a MUSLIM BAN then it probably is a MUSLIM BAN

I thought this was a Kirk post for a minute

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

that is nonsense, what evidence have you got to make such a statement?

The U.S arming Sadam to attack Iran.
U.S destroying Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria.
U.S fully supporting Israel against Palestine.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I thought this was a Kirk post for a minute

[arista]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I thought this was a Kirk post for a minute

Kirk
is needed again
I know his posts are LONG
but he is good fun.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Japan is not a country that preaches freedom in every single one of it's amendments. Japan wasn't built with the same priorities in mind, for a sizable chunk of it's history it was an isolationist country. To hold it to the same standards as the US is rather silly and ill-thought out.

The muslim ban is stamping over the liberties that the US constitution vowed to protect, it's there's states rebelling and blocking it and why Trump has resorted to threats of withholding funds for places that don't cave to his unconstitutional demands.

its not a muslim ban youre lying again

[the truth]

Originally Posted by dezzy

yes, let's not call the muslim ban a muslim ban although it targets muslim countries and it's people, with the exceptions of the countries trump has business interests in. Let's just ignore the fact that the muslim ban was a term trump came up and was a promise during his campaign, let's ignore the fact that sean spicer, the white house's representative to the press has called it a muslim ban before the white house went into full on damage control.

It it looks like a muslim ban. Sounds like a muslim ban then it probably is a muslim ban

radical islamist terrorists
radical islamist terrorists
radical islamist terrorists
34000 innocents murdered by them last year