[Smithy]

honestly there needs to be some proper rules rather than just infractions given on assumptions on interpretations

[Withano]

Originally Posted by James

The word 'obsessed' is an insult.

Alright, I was on your side up to here

[Dominic]

Originally Posted by James

The word 'obsessed' is an insult.

ok?

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

Eminem's a member?

nnn

[James]

Originally Posted by Firewire

http://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/menage

I've never heard of the word before.

[James]

Originally Posted by Withano

Alright, I was on your side up to here

Calling someone obsessed is insulting.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by James

I've never heard of the word before.

probably a good job cause you'd have probably said it was an insult

[T*]

so that's why you never see Obsession by Calvin Klein anymore

[Firewire]

Originally Posted by James

The word 'obsessed' is an insult.

LMAO

[Denver]

Poor LT being proven a liar

[Smithy]

so if someone said i was obsessed with lady gaga would they be infracted for it?

[Firewire]

Well you'd like to think

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by James

The word 'obsessed' is an insult.

I cackled

[James]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

I once got an infraction for watching a Coronation Street documentary lmao

I checked back and you actually got the infraction for using a Coronation Street character's name as a code word for another member, when there was a bit of a pack mentality against the person at the time.

You did say it was a coincidence though, mind you. However that seemed unlikely.

This was in 2013.

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by James

I checked back and you actually got the infraction for using a Coronation Street character's name as a code word for another member, when there was a bit of a pack mentality against the person at the time.

You did say it was a coincidence though, mind you. However that seemed unlikely.

This was in 2013.

Omg remember when Big Brother used to be as on the button as this instead of just sending in security?

[James]

Originally Posted by Smithy

so if someone said i was obsessed with lady gaga would they be infracted for it?

Depends on the context. You might welcome the description.

[Denver]

Can i be mod James

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by James

Depends on the context. You might welcome the description.

It's a bit tenuous though, wouldn't you say?

[T*]

Not to discuss infraccies or stir up drama but I was literally infracted for making a thread with a lot of gifs in it for Sue's entrance and like you woulda thought maybe a warning would've sufficed because I literally didn't know I was doing anything wrong when other threads have that amount of gifs like the BB17 gif threads which are also innocent but no I got a full blown infraction for spam which it was not...

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by James

Depends on the context. You might welcome the description.

but that just contradicts what you've said about it being an insult…

[Smithy]

I have like a list of people that want me to be a mod, this forum would be ship shape within a week i can promise you that

[Crimson Dynamo]

i think my case hath bean plead?

[Withano]

I haven't had an infraction in 2017 (apart from one that doesn't count cos its stupid). You guys should be more like me.

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by Withano

I haven't had an infraction in 2017[ ] (apart from one that doesn't count cos its stupid)[/b]. You guys should be more like me.

I think this thread shows we are like you.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by James

You left out the post where 'says someone who does not have to buy groceries..'. I don't know what you meant but it could be interpreted as a dig at another member.

if you dont


know what i meant

[James]

Originally Posted by Dominic

and apparently posting the video Mariah Carey - Obsessed is an insult

I just checked back and you posted that video, and a minute later made an obviously insulting post (in words), so the infraction was as much for that.