| FAQ | 
| Members List | 
| Calendar | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
|  |  | 
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  24-09-2007, 08:30 AM | #1 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			According to Heat: Quote: 
 | |||
|   | 
|  27-09-2007, 02:02 PM | #3 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			I think Heat tends to take the piss more than put them on pedestals.
		 | |||
|   | 
|  29-09-2007, 12:19 AM | #4 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Jolly good | 
			
			Don't know, I don't buy it... but I don't like the effect it has on Big Brother. They - and other celebrity gossip magazines - support and reward certain housemates (usually those involved in 'shomances') and ignore others. And lads' magazines and tabloids reward housemates based on how good-looking they are. That has influenced the type of HMs we see each year I think, and affected the way they act... you could say even corrupted BB a bit I think because the show is supposed to be based around personality. | |||
|   | 
|  29-09-2007, 12:31 AM | #5 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 
			
			I completely agree with you there, James. In general - I think heat can be very confusing sometimes. One week it applauds and supports a celebrity for doing something, only for them to attack and criticise them the next. A good few examples would be Amy Winehouse, Britney and Jordan. Ironically I buy heat mostly for the music/film reviews sections, and occasionally read the news/interviews. I couldn't really care less about their circle of shame. | |||
|   | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
| 
 | 
 |