FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
View Poll Results: When should non-cis.-confirming young people be taken seriously? | ||||||
Younger than 16 (you’re going to have to really explain to sell this one) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
16. Any younger than that is definitely way too young and vulnerable |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 100.00% | |||
|
||||||
Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
(In the case of young people who identify as trans..) I would’ve thought that everyone would agree that 16 should be the absolute-minimum age but there seems to be a bit of a thing about trans-kids needing that recognition and support too (in the sense of ultimately being encouraged to transition). I obviously disagree with that but where do you personally draw the line?
__________________
![]() ![]() At Obe’s Kitchen, it’s lamb-season all-year-round, not just at Easter. I rate that. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|