[ange7]

Originally posted by Tom

Same

But out of the options you gave it would be B, only because I'd rather live with the guilt of killing 1 person than being responsible for 30 people. But its not really a choice because if you dont people will die anyway, so either way death is involved.

Yeah Tom I would go for option B too but there's no right answer ... it's just a test to see at what point you would kill in cold blood.
Your right...either way people die yes but it is still a hard choice In option B you actively choose to directly take a human life in cold blood where as in option A your hands are clean but your indirectly responsible for the deaths of 30. So to answer it you need to weigh up the moral repulsion of taking a single person's life versus the "greater good" that would come as a consequence ie 20 get to live.
Oh and lol Netto.. option C would be shoot the commander!