 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troynuncdicit
Let's set things straight
BBUS1 wasn't all that good, BBUK1 still stands strong thirteen years later
BBUS2 was very solid, BBUK2 was subpar
BBUS3 was also very solid, BBUK3 was pretty decent
BBUS4 was just okay, BBUK4 sucked
BBUS5 was decent, BBUK5 was great
BBUS6 and BBUK6 were both great
BBUS7 was average, BBUK7 was great
BBUS8 was awful, BBUK8 was pretty bad
BBUS9 was kinda good, BBUK9 was very solid
BBUS10 was very solid, BBUK10 was very bad
BBUS11 was great, BBUK11 sucked
BBUS12 and BBUK12 were both awful
BBUS13 and BBUK13 were both steps back in the right direction
So yeah, there aren't many correlations at all.
|
BB9 is better than BB8? REALLY?
i disagree.
__________________
Don't be afraid to be weak.
Last edited by lostalex; 11-02-2013 at 04:28 AM.
|
Threaded Mode