Quote:
Originally posted by Arneldo
Quote:
Originally posted by the_stillness
Quote:
Originally posted by Arneldo
Quote:
Originally posted by the_stillness
Quote:
Originally posted by Arneldo
If this was the case, why didn't they do it last year, or the year before, or the year before that?
|
How much money was involved in Big Brother 5, 6 or 7 then? I think that the money this year was higher? I don't know for sure - I also have to say that Bookmakers will learn ways of playing these games and just because itmay have not happened before, is still not enough to win this argument, is it?
The Twins were robbed. The Bookmakers stole the Twins glory, it all fell to pieces and the thicko won
|
Less money was placed this year then any other year.
|
Doesn't matter!! Bookmakers get more canny and just because money may have been less than before - it still doesn't mean that the money voted on the underdog was any less or more - the winner - the same. I don't know exactly, as I only saw Big Brother 7 - but it does sound right
|
It doesn't sound right - But It is right and people need to realise it. The Twins loast and Brian won fair and square.
|
Mass voting can cause loads of probs and they can vote for other housemates too, just to muck it all up. I haven't looked at the breakdown percentagewise yet, as I've been busy - but I know that something wrong has happened and some sort of fix has happened - I say bookmakers and if we can't agree, then sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo be it