Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23-09-2018, 09:20 PM #1
JoshBB's Avatar
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,996

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Lily
BB2023: Yinrun
JoshBB JoshBB is offline
iconic
JoshBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,996

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Lily
BB2023: Yinrun
Default Questions regarding the International Definition of Antisemitism

I've been reading up a lot on the whole fiasco regarding Labour's refusal to adopt the full IHRA definition of anti-semitism. As a Labour member myself, I was really concerned when I first heard this, alongside many protests that asserted Labour was anti-semitic as a result. The last thing I would want is to be associated with a racist party in any way, shape, or form. Therefore, I decided to research.

I figured a good starting point was to look up the definition itself, and most of these are common sense that they should be adopted. But there were just two examples that I'm not 100% sure why they constitute anti-semitism, so perhaps someone here can help me to understand. I got the "eleven examples" from this Jewish news site, which I assume to be accurate.

The IHRA examples in question are;
Quote:
7) Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
To me, calls to "get rid of"/dissolve the current Israeli state are almost always a red flag that the person is an anti-semite. However, the bolded aspect is what confuses me. I feel that in a way, it censors the criticism of discrimination towards Arabic Israelis and some of the language the current government has used about Arabs. (ie. by Netanyahu)

Quote:
10) Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
This one I find quite problematic. I understand that it could be easy to cross lines in a justifiably sensitive topic, though I don't think any state or individual should be exempt from comparisons to Nazi ideology if they are legitimate. For example, most people would not raise issue with apartheid South African policy or North Korean policy being compared to the Nazis' - so what is the difference here? Not a rhetorical question, genuinely uncertain.

In advance, I hope y'all understand the education-seeking nature of this post, and apologies if I've offended any jewish members by questioning the technicalities of the IHRA definition peace and love
__________________
"PLEASE, how do i become a gay icon???" (:

Favourite housemates
if a series is excluded, then I haven't watched it or don't currently have a favourite.
Spoiler:

Favourite housemates (BBUK)
BB19: Lewis F
BB18: Chanelle
BB17: Jayne
BB16: Joel
BB15: Ashleigh
BB14: Gina
BB8: Charley
BB7: Nikki
BB6: Makosi

JoshBB is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
antisemitism, definition, international, questions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts