[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

These? I mean I think I've covered quite thoroughly over the many, many weeks of this discussion what I think about the Royal pundits/commentators/reporters/biographers and why I think they are the very definition of a biased and unreliable source. Have I not been clear in that? Well to clarify;

I didn't respond to these posts because I'm not interested in these "Royal writers". It's all irrelevant hearsay and drivel.

"If I don't want to believe something its all drivel and lies". (Those reports have been verified by royal commentators on national morning tv too, btw, not that you'll believe that either, eh?).

Tell me, do you believe Meghan's versions?