[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

It always makes me laugh when dopey Starmer - who doesn't know what a woman is - is referred to as a Sir.

The guy got that knighthood because he was a grovellor to the establishment. Not for anything worthy he's done.

He's plain Starmer to me.

I don't agree with the honours system.
I think a Knighthood should only be given if they must be, for exceptionally heroic actions.
So agree Starmer's doesn't impress me either.

However what you've said about Starmer's could be said about near all the Knighthood recipients over the last decades.
For me with a tiny few exceptions, as to the lot of them.