| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| View Poll Results: When should non-cis.-confirming young people be taken seriously? | ||||||
| Younger than 16 (you’re going to have to really explain to sell this one) |
|
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
| 16. Any younger than that is definitely way too young and vulnerable |
|
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
| 17 |
|
0 | 0% | |||
|
||||||
| 18 |
|
1 | 100.00% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
(In the case of young people who identify as trans..) I would’ve thought that everyone would agree that 16 should be the absolute-minimum age but there seems to be a bit of a thing about trans-kids needing that recognition and support too (in the sense of ultimately being encouraged to transition). I obviously disagree with that but where do you personally draw the line?
__________________
![]() ![]() Kentucky-Fried Goose. Flamingo, Fig and the Fire That Remembers. London’s shine is vast; Liverpool’s shine is textured. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|