FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
OG(den)
|
![]() Deportation of man jailed for more than five years for child sex offences blocked by immigration tribunal judge A convicted Zimbabwean paedophile was allowed to stay in Britain because he would face “hostility” if he was deported back to his home country. An immigration tribunal judge blocked his deportation to Zimbabwe by the Home Office because it would breach his rights under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) which prohibits torture, inhuman treatment and degrading punishment. Sarah Pinder, the judge, accepted his lawyers’ claims that, as an openly gay man who had been jailed for more than five years for child sex offences, he was likely to face “substantial hostility” from the Zimbabwean authorities. The man was also granted anonymity The verdict, disclosed in court papers, is the latest case exposed by The Telegraph in which migrants or convicted foreign criminals have used human rights legislation to secure the right to remain in the UK or avoided deportation in controversial circumstances. They include an Albanian criminal who avoided deportation after claiming his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets, and a Pakistani paedophile who was jailed for child sex offences but escaped removal from the UK as it would be “unduly harsh” on his own children. 🤡 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...to-stay-in-uk/ |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|