[*mazedsalv**]

Im not going to make this into a thread moaning about the Live Feed, because tit looks like there is nothing we can do about it. Im just curious to know what you think about why they axed the 24/7 Feed.

C4 are claiming that it is that it is expensive and because of the recession
1. If it was expensive, they could get rid of BBBM (which used to be MUCH better with Russell) or get rid of BBLB (not both of them, just 1).
2. All the BB's around the world show the Live Feed, its the whole point of the show. Even the most poorest countries in the world showing BB have money to pay for the feed. Many countries have more thsn 2 feeds, Italy has 8 I think!!

For me, the real reason is because of Rachel winning BB9. I know Ive said this before but if we had only seen the night on LF in BB9, no way would Rachel would have won (as much as i love her), the HL show edited her badly almost every show. The producers didnt like the fact that WE chose OUR winner, instead of THEY choosing our winner.

People may say "But the Live Feed votes for Rachel wouldnt have got her the win" Well technically it would have, considering 3m voetd throughout the series, Im guessing about 800,000-1m votes in the entire final, and LF is watched by about 400-600,000 averaged, the LF would have affected it. I would tell you now that if we had no LF, Sara(as much as that would make me happy too) or Mikey would have won.

What if in BB10, we miss so much. We wont know the HMs true selves as we wont see them 24/7, we could end up choosing a winner who is horrible but being edited to be an angel (eg. Luke).

Okayy so rant over, sorry about the long essay.
What do you think?