FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
On second watch, Freddie wasn't as bad as I thought first time round - i.e. in terms of the context of the whole thing. He WAS immature, but his WHOLE agenda was about getting back at Lisa who targeted him for over a month. Remember, she stopped targeting him when she finally realised the public sort of liked him. Once she was up for eviction, she flipped out at him again - so she IS a gameplayer - proven. This simply corroborates Freddie’s argument.
I also noticed that Freddie only started doing the ‘mad’ laughing and ‘teasing’ stuff (which is what he seems to be getting most stick for) AFTER Lisa started shouting at him – it was like it released the cap on both their boiling radiators. She was well in his face in that kitchen. Lisa couldn't handle it, i.e. her 'plaything' for the first few weeks now had the upper hand...she must be sick. Freddie threw it back in her face, but could really have made himself even stronger (in terms of public opinion) if he had held back on the ‘teasing’ element. So much is now down to how they all act over the next days/weeks. All welcome to respond, but it would be nice to get proper response on the assessment of the context (including first 5 weeks!), rather than ‘love Freddie’ vs ‘Freddie is an arrogant pr*ck’ BS. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|