[tintedshadow]

Originally posted by setanta
I'm not showing any bias in my question.... it's a valid point. Freddie shouldn't have bothered exchanging words with Charlie when it was perfectly clear that it wasn't necessary in this case to involve himself in the argument.

I never drew a comparison between the differing sides; it's a pointless exercise considering that I never suggested that one was worse than the other.

My whole reason for commenting is that Marcus' had told Bea that she shouldn't involve Freddie in their argument. It would have been far more prudent for him to just lie back in his bed and smile over the whole spectacle. No value in going out there.

brother im haven't questioned the validity of what you have said,nor have i stated that you were being bias in any way.infact i see the point your making..

fact remains,while i agree freddie shouldn't have got involved,he found something bea had said as hypocritic so he laughed... now while we can agree there may have been "no value for him going out there" you do realise if that was the reason he stayed out of it,that would be game playing?

so he stayed quiet until charlie got on his back,had that been me i think i would've had to move to him myself,charlies only reason for what he said to freddie was based on knowing how weak freddie is when it comes to settling disputes..

furthermore,charlie didnt see it as ganging up when him and kris had that game of hide and seek with freddie and picked him apart day by day...

anyways brother i understood and agree with what your saying.. so im not sure why you think i was challenging you but lets leave it there as i have to get going anyway...