[Ghostinthehouse]

All the so called justifications on here for people to win are based on how perfect they are. People say how 'nice' and 'well behaved' certain HM have been so they 'deserve' to win. Or maybe they just are more false and are better at not 'putting a step wrong', have you thought of that?

Siavash is not perfect - and that is why he should win. Because none of us human beings are perfect. Siavash should win exactly because has made mistakes, shown fraility, been made to look stupid and carried on. He doesn't try to play the 'who is the bestest HM' game. If he makes a decision he makes it because he has decided to, even recognising he could be wrong. He is an imperfect human being.

The BB winner should represent all facets of what it means to ***** up in that house, making us angry at times, think, question, and maybe learn that people in glass houses shouldn't be throwing bloody great rocks!

And lets face it, every single one of the HMs tries to get people to like them (to an extent that is human nature) but you have to admit that Siavash's attempts can be so bad at times that there is no way he could have planned it that way, he just isn't able to.

The (im)perfect winner - Siavash.