[Hunx1985]

Must Read: The BB production team know nothing of human psychology.

Whenever an interesting person is up for eviction (i.e. anyone who even TALKS or forms and interesting conversation, or, even better, an entertaining argument) WILL ALWAYS be evicted.

The voting public are NOTORIOUS for being thick s h i ts and that is NOT going to change. Period.

The only way to ensure good HMs stay is to CANCEL all evictions (until the final week or two) and REPLACE them with punishments.

I.e. say Ulrika and Nikki were up one week, well, the loser wouldn't be evicted, they'd instead have all their diary room rants displayed to the other HM's on the plasma screen (you know, the ones where they slag off other HMs). Or perhaps they would be punished by being locked in a cage for 3 days with only bread and water to survive on. Anything nasty would work.

By replacing evictions with this type of voting system, channel 4 WOULD get funding through votes (they also get enough via adverts too) and REAL fans like yours truly would get to watch all the best HMs stay in.

McCririck, for example, would still be IN if the voting system was changed.

BB producers know NOTHING of human pyschology and how to make an engaging show.

As do 99.99% of the thick idiots (probably people reading this very thread) out there too.