FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
BB4 Cameron, Ray, Scott, Jon Tickle, Nush and the others from Big Brother 4 in 2003. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 | |||
|
||||
Cyber Warrior
|
The contestants are people who have come from ordinary lives to volunteer to be scrutinised by us. The problem is, that somewhere in the production company it seems that there is a hidden agenda as to who they want to be evicted / win.
There have also been concerns about the boundaries that these echelons are willing to traverse. For example the BB2 Meals for two was a blatant attempt to get serious intimate action between two housemates (Helen & Paul) This was mentioned in the press at the time. It was only the fact that Mr Paul Clarke is such a gentleman that the scheme failed. The other boundary crossed was how much you make the contestants suffer, with BB3 it was the Bars, BB2 the Dog training task (I had to agree with Dean on that one) It also seems that ever since BB1, there have been foul ups and inconsistancies. I have not even begun to mention the shabby treatment of the tabloid press ![]() So why do I watch, as you ask ? The housemates are in a vulnrable position . The producers of Big Brother need to be held to account In order to have the right to do that, I need to be involved. That gives me the right to comment when things are not as they should. Leaving the battlefield only leaves it to other's unfettered opportunities to do what they want. |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|