[MrWong]

Originally Posted by cfromhx02

It was noticeable tonight how there was no noticeable sucking up to Gina on BBBOTS,means they know she's guilty tonight I think, and good that the whole panel defended Charlie , when they all know it's a den of Gina supporters and BB staff suck ups to Gina supporters,

There was barely any discussion about Gina so what exactly could the BOTS crowd react to? Oh and by the way, the crowd can support more than one housemate.

but none of the panel had the courage to say they'd seen Gina misrepresenting Charlie and seen her stirring things up and steeping back to smirk and laugh at the fight afterward.

The panel not slagging off Gina means they lack courage? Far more likely that they didn't see Gina's role as significant in the grand scheme of things.

But what was behind the BS from one of Gina's supporters who said Hazel was the one who had removed the pin from the handgranade and stepped back to enjoy the chaos afterward.

And what was behind the psyh who said that Hazel was the 1 who had reined in the dogs to encircle Charlie then let them loose to attack.

Didn't these people watch the same programme ?

Hazel was rattled by the nom's so threw her bessy under the bus. Much like Charlie did.

And particularly despicable that the psych who's on the staff was misrepresenting who caused the aggro,

or were they deliberately lying to make out Hazel had caused the trouble.

Surely they all saw it was Gina who started it and who misrepresented Charlie that she reigned them in then let them loose and it was her that stepped back to laugh ?

The F&F nom's caused the trouble. Pretty obvious I would have thought.