|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 303
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 303
|
Who's idea do you think it was to not use Vote To Save for civilian?
we are faced with yet another 'nominations twist', and we all know the reason for this is to keep another girl in ie jade, and hopefully evict a male.
the producers have interfered with noms more than ever since they reintroduced vote to 'evict', which makes me wonder whether 'they' really did want to use that voting system again and its not some higher power ?
it clearly does not work from a production point of view so why on earth dont they just use VTS as they do for the celebrity version??
YES i am well aware a section of the audience likes voting to 'evict', but im talking from a production point of view.
|
Aaron,
Threaded Mode