Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
It doesn't matter what charities you claim to support, it has no relevance to the topic at hand or what I said. Much of your rambling in this post has nothing to do with the topic at hand so I'm not entertaining it, this is not a political issue and your decision to make this about Asylum seekers is baffling and quite frankly desperate, you are trying to make a point by comparing apples and oranges.
Whether Starbucks allows homeless people to use their facilities or not is not politically motivated no matter how much you reach for it to be so. It's a matter of empathy and giving a couple of quid to Charity every month doesn't matter one bit, it does not make your opinion anymore valid.
|
As TS mentioned it won’t work - it can’t. Many homeless people using the facilities will be drunks and druggies and pose a risk to anyone else using them. Anti-social behaviour and potential violence will likely make them no-go areas for customers and staff alike.
No business or customer should be expected to tolerate that. As usual PC takes things too far and puts political ideals before practicalities, reality and the risks to others.