[Livia]

Originally Posted by Withano

Well you can continue making sarcy comments, or you can choose to contribute.

You're kind of just saying 'I haven't bothered with the information but I have a monopoly on this because I'm me'

Not impressed.

Hang on... you said it was a clear case of contempt of court? I questioned you.... that isn't a sarky comment. It was a challenge. Because you were wrong.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Livia

Hang on... you said it was a clear case of contempt of court? I questioned you.... that isn't a sarky comment. It was a challenge. Because you were wrong.

How would you know? You haven’t seen the livestream. How would we go about discussing that in a mutual way. This conversation cant go any further without a bit of effort on your end.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Withano

How would you know? You haven’t seen the livestream. How would we go about discussing that in a mutual way. This conversation cant go any further without a bit of effort on your end.

How would YOU know? from a livestream?

I've put in my effort thank you. Four years of study, lots of experience and a belief that neither someone who is not qualified in law - that's you - nor someone who is - that's me - can make a claim of ANY kind of charge from watching a livestream.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

I've put in my effort thank you. Four years of study, lots of experience and a belief that neither someone who is not qualified in law - that's you - nor someone who is - that's me - can make a claim of ANY kind of charge from watching a livestream.

Indeed, which is why we should accept that the people who arrested him, and those who charged him in the first place (as it keeps being overlooked across the media that he was on parole, it's not that he's been "locked up for reporting from a courthouse") ARE in possession of facts that Robinson supporters are not and DO have good and valid reasons for locking him up, rather than it being some sort of government conspiracy / KGB style ambush where he was bundled into the back of a van for daring to speak out against Muslims. Which is just clearly nonsense.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Indeed, which is why we should accept that the people who arrested him, and those who charged him in the first place (as it keeps being overlooked across the media that he was on parole, it's not that he's been "locked up for reporting from a courthouse") ARE in possession of facts that Robinson supporters are not and DO have good and valid reasons for locking him up, rather than it being some sort of government conspiracy / KGB style ambush where he was bundled into the back of a van for daring to speak out against Muslims. Which is just clearly nonsense.

'Nonsense' in YOUR opinion T.S which is no more qualified than mine or Tom Cobbley down the road.

In my opinion, there is FAR more to Robinson being arrested than for any purported 'Breach of the Peace'

The fact that there is no news about this most newsworthy of cases is very suss.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

'Nonsense' in YOUR opinion T.S which is no more qualified than mine or Tom Cobbley down the road.

In my opinion, there is FAR more to Robinson being arrested than for any purported 'Breach of the Peace'

The fact that there is no news about this most newsworthy of cases is very suss.

That's because you value your feelings over the facts.

It's not some government stitch up, they haven't planted evidence on him. He's been charged and he's going to go to court, they wouldn't do that without just cause. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it's not some conspiracy to silence some inbred chav that's only interested in self promotion.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Withano

How would you know? You haven’t seen the livestream. How would we go about discussing that in a mutual way. This conversation cant go any further without a bit of effort on your end.

Have you seen the livestream? Which part of it was a "clear contempt of court" ?