| FAQ | 
| Members List | 
| Calendar | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
|  |  | 
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  29-05-2018, 10:48 AM | #1 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Flag shagger. | Quote: 
 It was an answer to your imagined knowledge of the law when you made a hugely inaccurate statement. Since then you've wriggled and twisted and tried to make it something else... and failed. Let it go now. | |||
|   | 
|  29-05-2018, 10:52 AM | #2 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | Quote: 
 If you want to comment on things regarding law, then it is expected that you get clued up on the case... “I’m a lawyer” isn't a way to autowin every law-case you find on the internet. Sorry. You’re still expected to put the effort in. 
				__________________   | |||
|   | 
|  29-05-2018, 10:55 AM | #3 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Flag shagger. | Quote: 
 I never said I have a monopoly on anything. And making rude comments about my ego purely because I spoke about what I know - and you don't - doesn't give you leave to take the piss. When you finally leave school, you can speak with authority on whatever it is you've been studying for the last twenty-odd years. and I promise not to accuse YOU have having an over inflated ego. | |||
|   | 
|  29-05-2018, 11:00 AM | #4 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | Quote: 
 You attempted to state that your opinion on the case was more worthwhile because you are a lawyer with four years of education. It isnt. You havent seen the information. You are not more in-the-know based on your education. It wont be true when the next law-based thread comes along either - if youre not going to watch the information provided, your opinion on the information will mean less despite of your education. What youre doing is equal to ‘hi guys, i dont know much about grenfell tower, but im a trained fire marshall. It was a hairdryer’ his opinion means less than those who educated themselves on the disaster. 
				__________________   Last edited by Withano; 29-05-2018 at 11:01 AM. | |||
|   | 
|  29-05-2018, 01:04 PM | #5 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Flag shagger. | Quote: 
 You came up with a clear cut case of contempt of court after seeing a bit of film on the Internet. You didn't say it was your opinion, you said it was a clear cut case. And it was not. | |||
|   | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |