[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

So why do you need to research the names? Do you believe they all got together to tell lies, or that they genuinely believe they are trying to warn the country out of a sense of right or wrong.

We all know what you'll do:

Well Joe Bloggs once shared a cab with Blair, so he can't be trusted.

That Joan Bloggs once passed Gordon Brown in a corridor, so she can't be trusted.

John Doe - he marched against brexit so he's biased.

Jane Doe once wrote an article at university decrying the bullingdon club culture, so she's anti Boris.

Let me phrase things another way, what person could come forward to warn you about what was happening that would a) instantly have your trust about what they are saying? B) What would they have to say, in order to prove that you'd been lied to and duped?

If only the same energy was spent on researching the cons who led people to vote for brexit
Pathetic state of affairs. Some people will swallow anything if it agrees with their own prejudices.