[jet]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Right I get it..I'm feeding you? Ok I'll stop.

Pretty much....its a choice to respond.

[jet]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You discussing corbyn....not against the rules....

Fm discussing you....against the rules, but again...allowed cause it's dezzy.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

The key word being minority.*

There you go, I did it for you.

I don't get it? Why does being a minority mean they deserve more funding?

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

I don't get it? Why does being a minority mean they deserve more funding?

Because in the past it was all about the white man...now it's time to level things up for the black man....whilst ignoring the white folks who also need help because of things that happened long before they were born into the poverty they were born into....we must whilst doing this remember that it's all about having a level playing field in this day and age..

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

More dross......

Yet you bothered to respond, instead of ignoring.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You discussing corbyn....not against the rules....

Fm discussing you....against the rules, but again...allowed cause it's dezzy.

Corbyn Jeremy Corbyn.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Because in the past it was all about the white man...now it's time to level things up for the black man....whilst ignoring the white folks who also need help because of things that happened long before they were born into the poverty they were born into....we must whilst doing this remember that it's all about having a level playing field in this day and age..

The past is completely irrelevant. Kids today have nothing to do with the past, and underprivileged white kids are obviously not better off than BAME kids in the same circumstances. The only way to make it a level playing field is for everyone to be able to get the same levels of help.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

The key word being minority.*

There you go, I did it for you.

is it one particular minority that gets sole funding?

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

The past is completely irrelevant. Kids today have nothing to do with the past, and underprivileged white kids are obviously not better off than BAME kids in the same circumstances. The only way to make it a level playing field is for everyone to be able to get the same levels of help.

That's my exact point, white kids today have absolutely nothing to do with thier forefathers pasts, yet they seem to be the ones suffering in some circumstances.

[Livia]

There are all kinds of bursaries and scholarships available only to black and Asian applicants. I refuse to see why anyone would have a problem with a bursary or scholarship aimed just at poor white kids.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

You discussing corbyn....not against the rules....

Fm discussing you....against the rules, but again...allowed cause it's dezzy.

Bringing up Corbyn in every thread to derail it is against the rules I think you'll find.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

That's my exact point, white kids today have absolutely nothing to do with thier forefathers pasts, yet they seem to be the ones suffering in some circumstances.

Poor white people.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Bringing up Corbyn in every thread to derail it is against the rules I think you'll find.

I don't do it to derail a thread and I far from post in every thread, in fact, I'm not a regular poster at all. I bring it up as part of a point I am making. If people find it a problem, don't respond, no skin off my nose.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Livia

There are all kinds of bursaries and scholarships available only to black and Asian applicants. I refuse to see why anyone would have a problem with a bursary or scholarship aimed just at poor white kids.

It’s okay their white skin will be enough to tide them over in life, no need for any other input

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by jet

I don't do it to derail a thread and I far from post in every thread, in fact, I'm not a regular poster at all. I bring it up as part of a point I am making. If people find it a problem, don't respond, no skin off my nose.

Yes. You were making an on topic point.

Originally Posted by jet

Its not warped to detest a man who attends killers rallies and funerals and hangs around them like a love struck fanboy.
It's totally warped to be in thrall to such a man.

Originally Posted by jet

Awww, does it disturb you.
This is an ideal place for a good old Corbyn bash, use the ignore button if it bothers you....

Originally Posted by jet

Nope, I was saying this forum is a good place. No point discussing old Steptoe on a forum where everyone else detests him too...and I like to talk about things I know a lot about and I know a lot about Corbyn....

Originally Posted by jet

People don't have to respond, its not compulsory....including your valuable contribution....

Originally Posted by jet

Pretty much....its a choice to respond.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

It’s okay their white skin will be enough to tide them over in life, no need for any other input

Who suggested this?

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Poor white people.

Poor anyone who's not only disadvantaged, but also gets denied financial help due to their ethnicity. Racism isn't nice no matter who's on the receiving end.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Poor anyone who's not only disadvantaged, but also gets denied financial help due to their ethnicity. Racism isn't nice no matter who's on the receiving end.

They're not being denied funding.

Rejecting a "whites only" bursary from one donor =/= blocking funding for white kids. They have plenty of support.

It's so far from racism. Your use of the word is out of touch and ignorant.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

They're not being denied funding.

Rejecting a "whites only" bursary from one donor =/= blocking funding for white kids. They have plenty of support.

It's so far from racism. Your use of the word is out of touch and ignorant.

How do they have plenty of support when there a numerous BAME only scholarships but very few available to white pupils? How is rejecting one for white kids not racism?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

How do they have plenty of support when there a numerous BAME only scholarships but very few available to white pupils? How is rejecting one for white kids not racism?

You said they are being denied support. That is false.

How is rejecting a whites only policy not racism? Well, because "whites only" as a policy is inherently racist.

One supporting ethnic minorities is not comparable.

It would be like asking why any support for the working class is not matched and equal with support for the middle class. Because they are not the same.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It would be like asking why any support for the working class is not matched and equal with support for the middle class. Because they are not the same.

Working class white and BAME kids are the same though. Neither inherently has an advantage over the other in society.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

is it one particular minority that gets sole funding?

I don't know cherie, maybe that's something you could look into?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yes. You were making an on topic point.

Those posts were replies to digs about my posting about Corbyn...(you left out the quotes which prompted those replies of course) - I guess I'm supposed to keep silent but others can carry it on...
like you are now, so on topic. And I suppose you missed my initial post which included Corbyn as part of making a point.
Do you get things so wrong often?

[Kizzy]

Im just surprised that the schools are getting criticism for refusing to discriminate... :/

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I don't know cherie, maybe that's something you could look into?

I don't need to, I'm not denying funding to one group over another like you are advocating kizzy