| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I don't know if I'm being naive, but whilst this is clearly hypocritical of her, I don't see the huge deal?
If she went there with just her family (who she lives with) then surely they are not putting anyone at risk? |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Its because it goes against the essential travel narrative. They have said visiting holiday homes, caravans etc is not essential.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Simply as unnecessary travelling can result in accidents and breakdowns which put further unnecessary strains on the services Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
She is coming from a city area to a small rural community, and her family, increasing infection risk there massively. It's beyond recklass
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Deny, Defend, Depose.
|
Quote:
__________________
![]()
Last edited by The Slim Reaper; 25-05-2020 at 06:01 PM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|