[Kizzy]

Ah my little raincloud of doom is back.
Never accused anyone personally of anything if you care to look back ..or don't again, I'm not bothered.
My hope was the abuse would lessen after the case, it hasn't it's got worse.
Much like your trolling.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Ah my little raincloud of doom is back.
...

Much like your trolling.

How embarrassing for you.

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Never accused anyone personally of anything if you care to look back ..or don't again, I'm not bothered.
My hope was the abuse would lessen after the case, it hasn't it's got worse.

Of course you didn't accuse people personally, that would require you to backup your statements with some actual substance and evidence. But you won't do that, either because you're blindly defending "the woman" just because so are clinging to anything to find fault with her detractors or you don't like having your opinion challenged with facts. Probably both.

You hoped which abuse would lessen? I can pull up numerous examples of Johnny Depp being vilified on twitter before and after the trial. The difference is, I'm not blindly trying to represent either of them as "the" victim in this situation.

Heard doesn't become unaccountable for her abuses because she is a woman, or because her former husband was abusive himself. That works both ways. It's called being rational.

Calling her abusive because she herself is guilty of abusive behaviour is not misogynistic, no matter how much you love victim mentality, as evidenced by your reaction to anyone daring to quote you on a forum.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

How embarrassing for you.



Of course you didn't accuse people personally, that would require you to backup your statements with some actual substance and evidence. But you won't do that, either because you're blindly defending "the woman" just because so are clinging to anything to find fault with her detractors or you don't like having your opinion challenged with facts. Probably both.

You hoped which abuse would lessen? I can pull up numerous examples of Johnny Depp being vilified on twitter before and after the trial. The difference is, I'm not blindly trying to represent either of them as "the" victim in this situation.

Heard doesn't become unaccountable for her abuses because she is a woman, or because her former husband was abusive himself. That works both ways. It's called being rational.

Calling her abusive because she herself is guilty of abusive behaviour is not misogynistic, no matter how much you love victim mentality, as evidenced by your reaction to anyone daring to quote you on a forum.

There's nothing rational about death threats...or your reaction to my comments in this thread.

I might just let you both argue yourselves up your own axis because I made my point on page 2. I did and still do find the language used to describe Amber Heard misogynistic.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

There's nothing rational about death threats...

Nobody said death threats were rational.
Conflating a point about comments you labelled misogynistic in this thread with a separate point about twitter comments to distract the conversation is another attempt to invent a point nobody made. Stick to things that exist, not what you're making up.

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I might just let you both argue yourselves up your own axis because I made my point on page 2. I did and still do find the language used to describe Amber Heard misogynistic.

You're the only one arguing.
You didn't make any point on page 2. You've continually avoided making any point at all because you can't admit your original comment was simply wrong.