[Kate!]

Originally Posted by parmnion

All meghan is trying to do is hide the fact she quit the job cause she couldnt suffer to shake all those hands..something diane would never have contemplated.

Wut? How do you know this.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Kate!

I'm with Scarlett.

So you agree with spreading negative fake news about someone...

Sounds like a ****ty thing to do imo...but each to their own..

[GoldHeart]

Both Meghan and Harry felt pressured & trapped and it was affecting their mental health, there's more to the royal institution / duties than greeting People.
Non of us knows what happens within the palace walls,but it's not a fairytale clearly. And I don't envy that lifestyle.

[Kate!]

Scŕrletts not spreading fake news.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

read it and weep

This has literally no bearing on what I said, I don't have a particularly high opinion of the average unironic GMB viewer

[rusticgal]

No....but I fear for Harry’s mental health...especially if he doesn’t re connect with his family.



Meghan would like to see herself as a parallel to Diana...but she isn’t.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

No....but I fear for Harry’s mental health...especially if he doesn’t re connect with his family.

Thats a good relevant post. Its a shame they have to be estranged.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yes she is...shes talking ****e..slanderous ****e..and it's getting reported to the authorities.

He was found to be complicit in the hacking Parm, by a judge during the Levinson enquiry. He knew the hacking was happening at his paper and had a moral, if not legal responsibility to report it. He knew 12'months before that the hacking was happening. His behaviour was reprehensible as the person who could have stopped it happening.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

He was found to be complicit in the hacking Parm, by a judge during the Levinson enquiry. He knew the hacking was happening at his paper and had a moral, if not legal responsibility to report it. He knew 12'months before that the hacking was happening. His behaviour was reprehensible as the person who could have stopped it happening.

Good post

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

No....but I fear for Harry’s mental health...especially if he doesn’t re connect with his family.

The family that will only love him for who they want him to be? how will he cope.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

He was found to be complicit in the hacking Parm, by a judge during the Levinson enquiry. He knew the hacking was happening at his paper and had a moral, if not legal responsibility to report it. He knew 12'months before that the hacking was happening. His behaviour was reprehensible as the person who could have stopped it happening.

But not the hacking of a dead girls phone.

That was the news of the world and one of its reporters..piers was at the mirror at the time.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

No....but I fear for Harry’s mental health...especially if he doesn’t re connect with his family.



Meghan would like to see herself as a parallel to Diana...but she isn’t.

But you call into question Meghans mental health?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

so is it only kate so far?

Agreeing with the premise of the thread? They're not the same person so it's impossible to know, and also as you keep pointing out, there was an element of simple bad luck & recklessness involved in Diana's death BUT let's not start pretending that her life with the Royals and whst went down with Charlie didn't play into her ending up in a car hooning round Paris with no seat belt on. It wasn't "total" chance. She was in risky situations because that's where her life took her.

Is it possible that Meghan would have ended up in worrying situations due to her unhappy life feeling trapped by the Royals? Yes. Obviously no one can say how it would have turned out for certain. I personally don't think that's much justification for insisting that either Meghan, or Harry, should be willing to "just see how it goes".

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

that wasnt the question you asked??

my question was Does anyone genuinely think Meghan is at risk? I interpret Glenn and Scarletts responses as supportive. They can correct me if they wish. Xx

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Kate!

No. Scarlett and Glenn support Meghan too.

Why would she need our support ? are people,for real ?they are talking as though she is their best buddy and down and out ,lol Tibb is hilarious at times

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Why would she need our support ? are people,for real ?they are talking as though she is their best buddy and down and out ,lol Tibb is hilarious at times

Its funny how Kate never gets this devoted support?

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Why would she need our support ? are people,for real ?they are talking as though she is their best buddy and down and out ,lol Tibb is hilarious at times

Yes Kaz its laughable !

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Why would she need our support ? are people,for real ?they are talking as though she is their best buddy and down and out ,lol Tibb is hilarious at times

No I'm talking like she's a vulnerable young woman same as Diana was hence the comparison.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kate!

No I'm talking like she's a vulnerable young woman same as Diana was hence the comparison.

she's a vulnerable young woman

she is 40

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

she's a vulnerable young woman

she is 40

Thats not old but OK then. She is a vulnerable woman.

[GoldHeart]

Meghan is NOT old

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Thats not old but OK then. She is a vulnerable woman.

No she's not . she's in command and trying to be puppet master general

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Kate!

No I'm talking like she's a vulnerable young woman same as Diana was hence the comparison.

She isn't vulnerable imo, she has more help at her feet than any of us, she's a big girl I'm sure she knows what she is doing , I think there are far more vulnerable girls and women we should worry about, She has her husband by her side plus all her fans.she will be fine.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

No I'm talking like she's a vulnerable young woman same as Diana was hence the comparison.

very true kate

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

She isn't vulnerable imo, she has more help at her feet than any of us, she's a big girl I'm sure she knows what she is doing , I think there are far more vulnerable girls and women we should worry about, She has her husband by her side plus all her fans.she will be fine.

Who are you to tell us who isn't vulnerable? anyone who had suicidal thoughts is vulnerable....those thoughts can easily come back to her.