| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
The Italian Job
|
Quote:
Only the booster covid jab.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
HEALTH chiefs have added a new side effect to the official list for two Covid jabs.
Heart-swelling links had been made between the Pfizer and Moderna jabs in recent weeks, after more cases were reported. 🔵 Read ourcoronavirus live blog for the latest updates And now the UK’s drugs regulator has updated the safety information to show it is a possible side effect for both. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency says the conditions is still “extremely rare” and “typically mild”. The inflammation of the heart muscle can damage the organ over time. Experts say the benefits of getting the jab far outweighs the risks, but it could impact the debate on vaccinating kids. After investigating less than 100 cases in the UK, the MHRA concluded the vaccines could be the cause of swelling reports. The conditions reported are myocarditis, which causes inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining outside the heart. Young men are most affected, particularly after a second dose, research shows. The MHRA said anyone who experiences “chest pain, shortness of breath or feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart” after a jab should seek urgent medical attention
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Do we know WHY the second covid jab is being brought forward? I thought they were specifically designed to have both far apart, or was the long gap purely to stagger appointment times?
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
the original schedule was based on the alpha variant, where 1 jab gave a lot of protection, so it was a case of getting 1 jab in as many arms as possible. With the delta variant, 2 jabs are needed, but > 4 weeks gives additional protection so thats why there is the current time frame
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() So originally the second jab was to just be in the other arm? But now there are to essentially be 4 jabs? I'm sorry I'm so confused.
__________________
"Seeing Is Believing" |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
haha, 2 jabs total, and it doesn't matter which arm they go in
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Think this is the post that started all the confusion ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|