| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Dumb thread go derby dumb dumb.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Asking pointed, accusatory questions, demanding answers to those questions, and then drawing conclusions from a refusal to answer is not a “legit” debating tactic by any stretch of the imagination. It’s almost always an attempt to “set a snare” by the person asking the question. The ONLY legitimate thing to do when someone “demands” the answer to a leading question is to refuse to answer it - even if you have an answer. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
and boy was she seething that her awful extreme politics got outed |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
Doesn’t matter, you don’t answer “boobytrap” questions. If someone demands an answer you refuse until they ask the question more fairly. Refusal to answer doesn’t indicate stance. You should always refuse. Someone asks “Answer the question - do you believe that _________ or not???” You don’t answer, you don’t pander, you don’t cave to aggressive questioning. It’s an automatic loss. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|