[Crimson Dynamo]

oh dear

oh deary me

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-sex-car.html

EXCLUSIVE: Two years AFTER Meghan quit Deal or No Deal for feeling like a 'bimbo' she took raunchy 90210 cameo giving character Ethan oral sex in a car, newly resurfaced clip shows.

Comment:
Glad to see that she made such great use of her college degree from Northwestern University.

This is what was on your mind at 7AM on a Sunday morning... bless you.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Tbf just because she has taken on a role doesn't mean she has to like the role.

Apparently acting is a brand new concept to some

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Apparently acting is a brand new concept to some

Like choosing the roles you want to play…

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Like choosing the roles you want to play…

She was a new actress still looking to get her start not Meryl Streep

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Liam-]

If people are shocked by some of the roles Meghan played, they must be utterly mortified by some of the things the royal family have actually done

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

She was a new actress still looking to get her start not Meryl Streep

So?….

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

So?….

Clearly you know nothing about the film and TV industry if you think new actors have the luxury to be picky about what roles they take. But then again you also think the fake actions of a fictional character portrays badly on the real person in the role so there's that...

[Oliver_W]

Oh for heavens sake, this is getting to be like BrilloPad with her anti-Corbyn threads - remember when she made one about how he didn't give away his umbrella when it was raining?

So a starting out actress who was desperate for fame did some things she's not proud of. So what?

The Deal or No Deal thing - she wasn't whinging about how she dressed, she was complaining that the role didn't utilise her brains, only her body. As that other zeleb had a different story to tell, I'm guessing Meghan was treated differently, and saw that she was. Otherwise, why would someone in the role she had complain about it?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Lets hope her next podcast with Bubble off of Big Brother she can clarify what she meant by the term Bimbo?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Clearly you know nothing about the film and TV industry if you think new actors have the luxury to be picky about what roles they take....

Depends how desperate you are….it’s just rich coming from someone who as a teenager got herself lauded defending the image of women and how they are portrayed…only to go on and do what she did for the price of fame.
Stinks of hypocrisy to me….

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Depends how desperate you are….it’s just rich coming from someone who as a teenager got herself lauded defending the image of women and how they are portrayed…only to go on and do what she did for the price of fame.
Stinks of hypocrisy to me….

If ever you needed evidence of her utter hypocrisy and desperation to climb the greasy nasty pole

with every attempt to portray herself as something she isnt the veil slips lower and lower into the slimy gutter

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Depends how desperate you are….it’s just rich coming from someone who as a teenager got herself lauded defending the image of women and how they are portrayed…only to go on and do what she did for the price of fame.
Stinks of hypocrisy to me….

Do what? Dare to have FAKE oral sex??? Imagine women that do the real thing

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Clearly you know nothing about the film and TV industry if you think new actors have the luxury to be picky about what roles they take.

It’s nothing to do with ‘starting out’ - by all accounts, she never had a role in the whole of her acting career where she wasn’t ‘objectified’ if that is how she really felt about Deal or No Deal. In fact, it was the least of the roles that ‘objectified’ her.

She has played a ‘bimbo’, if that is what she calls that type of objectifying role, in almost every single acting job she had. Even in Suits, she was the ‘sexy’ love interest. She once wrote on her blog, the Tig, that she capitalised on her ‘sexy little body’.

She has never had a serious role in her life where she has kept her clothes on. Nothing wrong with that, but then don’t try to reinvent yourself, just be truthful and don’t bring others down. Has she heard of internet history?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

It’s nothing to do with ‘starting out’ - by all accounts, she never had a role in the whole of her acting career where she wasn’t ‘objectified’ if that is how she really felt about Deal or No Deal. In fact, it was the least of the roles that ‘objectified’ her.

She has played a ‘bimbo’, if that is what she calls that type of objectifying role, in almost every single acting job she had. Even in Suits, she was the ‘sexy’ love interest. She once wrote on her blog, the Tig, that she capitalised on her ‘sexy little body’.

She has never had a serious role in her life where she has kept her clothes on. Nothing wrong with that, but then don’t try to reinvent yourself, just be truthful and don’t bring others down. Has she heard of internet history?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by jet

It’s nothing to do with ‘starting out’ - by all accounts, she never had a role in the whole of her acting career where she wasn’t ‘objectified’ if that is how she really felt about Deal or No Deal. In fact, it was the least of the roles that ‘objectified’ her.

She has played a ‘bimbo’, if that is what she calls that type of objectifying role, in almost every single acting job she had. Even in Suits, she was the ‘sexy’ love interest. She once wrote on her blog, the Tig, that she capitalised on her ‘sexy little body’.

She has never had a serious role in her life where she has kept her clothes on. Nothing wrong with that, but then don’t try to reinvent yourself, just be truthful and don’t bring others down. Has she heard of internet history?

[AnnieK]

I'm struggling with what she has done wrong now. She felt objectified on Deal or No Deal and she absolutely was. All the girls hired for those kind of roles are hired for one reason, the way they look. The Dolly Dealers we used to have here were hired for their looks, they didn't need a talent, just a size 8 figure and pretty face. That's the reason we don't have them any more here and why grid girls aren't used any more etc etc

With regards to her acting history and whether she was a bimbo in her roles or not,she will have had to auditioned against a number of other suitably good looking women and so she will have had to have done the best audition and used her acting skills. Whether those roles then were her simulating sex, being a love interest or anything else is by the by. She was not objectified in the same way that the girls on game shows are.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

You enjoyed that research didn't you

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

It’s all rather weird when as a teenager she complained and spoke up for women being downplayed in some commercial about women doing the dishes or something….but then goes on to sexualising herself on a game show and then giving someone a blow job…all for the sake of fame and fortune.

Tbf being sexual doesn't mean she can't be a Feminist.

Feminism imo should be women being embraced for anything they want to do, as long as it's not criminal.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Like choosing the roles you want to play…

When starting out Actors/Actresses can't be too picky about their role in a product, otherwise they'll never get a major role.

[jet]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

I'm struggling with what she has done wrong now. She felt objectified on Deal or No Deal and she absolutely was. All the girls hired for those kind of roles are hired for one reason, the way they look. The Dolly Dealers we used to have here were hired for their looks, they didn't need a talent, just a size 8 figure and pretty face. That's the reason we don't have them any more here and why grid girls aren't used any more etc etc

With regards to her acting history and whether she was a bimbo in her roles or not,she will have had to auditioned against a number of other suitably good looking women and so she will have had to have done the best audition and used her acting skills. Whether those roles then were her simulating sex, being a love interest or anything else is by the by. She was not objectified in the same way that the girls on game shows are.

She is complaining that she felt objectified and a ‘bimbo’ on Deal or No Deal’ (yet stayed for 39 weeks) - then she ‘got out’. How does that make the other girls who stayed on the show for years feel? Are they all ‘bimbo’s then? Holier than thou Meghan, who is better than they are.
Several of them have spoken up and they are NOT happy. They say all the girls were treated with respect, they loved being on the show and it brought them great opportunities.They were hired not just for their looks, but for their outgoing personalities and ability to connect with the contestants. But not Meghan, she has to be victimised, in one way or another, in everything she does. Over and over again.

Whoopi Goldberg has come out and given her a piece of her mind too, at the shade he is throwing on the other girls in the show.

It is hypocritical to complain and then go on and take a part where your only scene in a movie is simulating a blow job, or again, your only scene in which your credit was 'the hot girl' crawling half naked up a bed to strip a guy and then call it non - objectifying acting.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by jet

She is complaining that she felt objectified and a ‘bimbo’ on Deal or No Deal’ (yet stayed for 39 weeks) - then she ‘got out’. How does that make the other girls who stayed on the show for years feel? Are they all ‘bimbo’s then? Holier than thou Meghan, who is better than they are.
Several of them have spoken up and they are NOT happy. They say all the girls were treated with respect, they loved being on the show and it brought them great opportunities.They were hired not just for their looks, but for their outgoing personalities and ability to connect with the contestants. But not Meghan, she has to be victimised, in one way or another, in everything she does. Over and over again.

Whoopi Goldberg has come out and given her a piece of her mind too, at the shade he is throwing on the other girls in the show.

It is hypocritical to complain and then go on and take a part where your only scene in a movie is simulating a blow job, or again, your only scene in which your credit was 'the hot girl' crawling half naked up a bed to strip a guy and then call it non - objectifying acting.

Obviously some of the women won't feel objectified.....but some do. Some will have had great opportunities, others will have not....it depends on the individual. She was talking about how she felt. That's what people do, talk about their own experiences.

Meghan had sexy parts.....as many other trying to break into acting do. She got the Suits gig after probably many bit parts....the same way every actor,male or female started. Many of them have to do dodgy bit parts to make their way.

What Whoopu Goldberg says is irrelevant considering her recent controversy in my opinion she needs to worry about her own words rather than dictating what others have said

[The Slim Reaper]

Youtube video

[rusticgal]

She says she wants Lillibet to have higher aspirations than being a briefcase girl on Deal or no Deal…being in the privileged position she is in she won’t have to, so lucky her.
Meghan forgets all too quickly that there are many young girls that are not in that position to pick and choose…which is why her and Harry’s podcasts are so out of touch and self righteous when they sit in the lap of luxury.