[arista]

This is better than using Starmer.

[joeysteele]

Just about anyone would be better than having Starmer in them.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Just about anyone would be better than having Starmer in them.

……yeah thats so true, Joey…and sadly I think applies to either of the main two parties…that both broadcasts would benefit from a ‘relatable stand in…’…that’s how far off it is in having any ‘party for the people…’….

[Crimson Dynamo]

A wealthy middle-class actor luvvie is ideal for labour to use

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Ammi

……yeah thats so true, Joey…and sadly I think applies to either of the main two parties…that both broadcasts would benefit from a ‘relatable stand in…’…that’s how far off it is in having any ‘party for the people…’….

Indeed Ammi.
He sends me to sleep almost does Starmer.

[bots]

i think people will get a shock if/when labour win. It won't be like any labour party there has been in the past. Most tory and labour policies have converged, they just emphasise different aspects, but the underlying principles will be identical

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i think people will get a shock if/when labour win. It won't be like any labour party there has been in the past. Most tory and labour policies have converged, they just emphasise different aspects, but the underlying principles will be identical

…with 4 years of knowing the Kier Factor….?….hmmmm….no, I think the shock would only have been if it was noticed that a new day had dawned…