[joeysteele]

I've absolutely no time for this woman whatsoever.
Not one scrap.

[arista]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I've absolutely no time for this woman whatsoever.
Not one scrap.

Thats Fine


But should she have served less time
for her 12 year old daughter's sake

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by arista

Thats Fine


But should she have served less time
for her 12 year old daughter's sake

Why does someone having child make them immune to serving a certain jail sentence for committing a crime and admitting to it?

For the charges she pleaded guilty to carry a minimum sentence of 3 years. She got the shortest sentence she possibly could.

[arista]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Why does someone having child make them immune to serving a certain jail sentence for committing a crime and admitting to it?

For the charges she pleaded guilty to carry a minimum sentence of 3 years. She got the shortest sentence she possibly could.

No
still serve a sentence
but not as long

As she was guilty

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Why does someone having child make them immune to serving a certain jail sentence for committing a crime and admitting to it?

For the charges she pleaded guilty to carry a minimum sentence of 3 years. She got the shortest sentence she possibly could.

That's not how it happened..if she hadn't pled guilty she would have got 4.5 years...she pled guilty, bit the judge still started h8s sentencing at 4.5 years, then reduced for the guilty plea to 3.

He could have started at 3, then reduced for the guilty plea.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Beso

That's not how it happened..if she hadn't pled guilty she would have got 4.5 years...

IF found guilty. Any decent lawyer would have been able to get her off on a jury trial.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

IF found guilty. Any decent lawyer would have been able to get her off on a jury trial.

Not under starmers commands they wouldn't..100 percent she would still be in jail if she had pled not guilty..probably at this moment in time just starting a legnthy sentence after spending months on remand awaiting trial.


She speaks about all this during the interview

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Why does someone having child make them immune to serving a certain jail sentence for committing a crime and admitting to it?

For the charges she pleaded guilty to carry a minimum sentence of 3 years. She got the shortest sentence she possibly could.

Tbh it should have been a suspended sentence.

No way was what she did bad enough to warrant jail time.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Tbh it should have been a suspended sentence.

No way was what she did bad enough to warrant jail time.

Yes I agree. She did not deserve to go to jail. I hope she uses and wins.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

Thats Fine


But should she have served less time
for her 12 year old daughter's sake

Absolutely not.
In my view, she shouldnt likely be out now.
She doesn't appear to have learned anything.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I've absolutely no time for this woman whatsoever.
Not one scrap.

She's definitely giving off a bad vibe associating herself with Dan Wootton.