FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
And in the latest episode of Starmer’s Stasi Britain, these two dimwit WPCs force entry to a private dwelling because a CHILD viewed a social media post and they want to seize her phone.
Where is their warrant? Where is their common sense? Decency? https://x.com/AllisonPearson/status/1969669556298752243 Last edited by Crimson Dynamo; 21-09-2025 at 10:44 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Should on Starmers Woes thread.
Does not make sense? Her kid viewed a post - about What? Last edited by arista; 21-09-2025 at 10:36 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
Disgusting. They do not have the power to push their way into people's homes, I hope the mother sues them and they're both sacked. The one in the headscarf was **** ing rude. I have never heard of anyone getting arrested for viewing a social media post. But then here we are in Starmer's Britain.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Starmer’s Stasi Britain,
Yes he should watch it |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Msg to the 2 WPCs. 👇
Unlawful use of a non-warrant power under s19 of the Police & Criminal Evidence Act. You were not lawfully in that house because you had no power of entry. Girls, you’re in trouble. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They should prosecute the individual who edited the footage to bring distress to the two policewomen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Police Officers today..
Its like from a piss take sketch show ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Well I would hate a country WITHOUT a police force !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
…my thoughts would have been to know a fuller context/story to that small clip, to help form those thoughts…it’s a great example of the dangers of social media and misinformation which is making it difficult to have any accuracy because accuracy doesn’t seem to be implemented so much anymore…it’s more about ‘influencing’ and slanting…and it’s become a very similar game with mainstream media, which makes it very difficult for the news seeking public who aren’t guided by political agendas…
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
1.5x speed
|
UK cops deny arresting girl over social media post, probe ‘indecent messages’ sent from fake account
https://nypost.com/2025/09/21/world-...al-media-post/
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
i must be missing something, i see no plot twist, just seems that people are not aware of the full details of what happened and thats certainly nothing new
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Piss orf.
|
Quote:
Thanks for posting LT, I forgot it was this thread. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
1.5x speed
|
Quote:
I watched. He spent about the required time to get monetized as quickly as possible just mostly reading ads and through the police statement, but then comments... "But I can't get into it". Then he asks people to "please subscribe". Very briefly goes out of grift mode to chat more filler. Then dovetails back in causing serious whiplash with another long ad segment for an eSIM service where he complains about his internet going down. 6 minutes in and still no substance. What he said that was "new" could've just been a tweet and so it was... but tweets don't pay the bills:
He had seen the video and there was no indicator they entered the property with the owner's permission. ![]() Another odd thing he had said which set off red flags... "I reached out to the police for comment"... you mean the same police you're helping a hostile client to file a claim against...? ![]() I follow different trials and law content. When he comments on American news, I sometimes have caught his takes. They seem decent enough at summing up simple information for people not familiar with the details, but other than that he's doing what some other Lawtubers will eventually do to expand the grift which is take on pseudo-clients and then milk them for content. Unless he's known as a powerful litigator and not just for his charming personality, then I don't see how his involvement is noteworthy other than it increases his social media relevance. A brief peak at Twitter... Spoiler: He's riding the content wave. It's what his species does. This one isn't related, but it made me laugh... the intense struggle... "Captain, please respond!": ![]() S: https://x.com/ahgoongoongoon/status/1969770178113151206
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|