[bigbr0ther]

Originally posted by Jase
I would like it longer, the thing with british public is they vote out the entertaining ones!

That's true. The worst thing is that there's usually a boring person up as well who ends up staying.

Originally posted by bananarama
No don't like the idea at all. Having a lot of people to shoot down is what is wrong with modern BB series. It turns the format into the equivalent of a shooting gallary on a fair ground instead of a psychological game show which it should be.....A game show that develops story lines and interactions. Not a show that as soon a story line develops a main character is evicted......

My plan actually involves fewer people total than the show currently has each series. If the show were not about being a shooting game, there wouldn't be any evictions at all. They could just put everyone in at the beginning, then at the end the public votes who should win out of everyone. (This would actually be a good show, in my opinion, even if it weren't Big Brother).

Whats needed is later eviction.....(At least two weeks before any genuine eviction takes place). Evictions from week one gives no one either viewers or housemates to properly evaluate each other let alone develop relationships of either hate or love.....

Hm, good idea.

There should always be three up for eviction (to confuse the bookies) and they should vote to save.......

This is also a good idea.

Originally posted by Fom
A better plan would be a vote to save, and to keep the entertaining housemates in and evict the boring ones. If stuart goes this week over Rachel it proves that people are voting out bigger characters over boring characters.

The series could go on for even longer if this simple change was put into place.

Hm, the sad thing is that that's probably true. BB7 a lot of good characters were still in there and that wasn't boring at all at the end.