[Tom]

Originally posted by Mark

This is one of the statements I find is most annoying when religious people use it. It's used without any sort of explanation in something that isn't possible within our realms of existence, along with all the other impossible scientific 'miracles' that god and jesus got up too. Turning water into wine, rising from the dead after being killed. We are just supposed to assume these all as fact because they were written in a book several thousand years ago by hundreds of different people. Even with all the technology we have nowadays we cannot bring a man back to life, but 2000 years ago, god managed it fine. When I think about it I think of it in a time process. Being dead is a boolean state of existence, you are either alive or you aren't.
As soon as people talk about evolution, religious people are quick to knock it down as "how does something come from nothing". There is a large amount of double standards going on.

Evolutionists are constantly working on, and spending millions/billions on tests to put their beliefs into 'fact'. While no-one in our lifetime will ever know which is correct, I'm siding with the people who are experimenting, testing and putting some sort of scientific explanation out there about how we came about. I'm not siding with those who have imaginary friends in the sky.

I wasn't arguing against that btw, I was just giving the point of view that they would give, I pretty much agree with everything you put