[Tom]

Originally posted by FrenchAffair2

Show me this proof that it is the result of brain structure.

But why do you mention upbringing? Are you suggesting that ones sexuality is a result of how they are brought up??

I meant to say or, not and. So my bad. Anyway evidence (not proof) for brain structure

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-7988.html

A lot of articles came out at a similar time based on the same research

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2404109.stm

Both goes more way to suggest its natural than not

Theres also this about sheep. Maybe its applicable to humans, maybe not

Harm is irrelevant to my point. The question is pretty straight forward, you're just dancing around it because you don't like the awnser.

If homosexuality is natural, then so is paedophilia. Because what is paedophilia other than "sexual preference" and if sexual prefrence other than that for the opposite sex is "natural"...

Harm is not irrelevant, it is only irrelevant because it doesn't fit your argument. The difference is consent, how can you not grasp that? And yes, paedophilia must be natural, I'm not denying that, but the difference is its harming people and clearly one taking advantage of another. But its also two different reasons and its supposed to be thought processes, hence rehab programs have helped them stop thinking like that. To compare the two is crazy.