[NolasGirl]

Originally posted by The_Long_Run
Another deluded poster starting a thread that talks about 'fairness' in nominations. What has fairness to do with it. Only fair if they choose the ones YOU want to be up for eviction? LOL

Marcus is running scared now. he can't possibly be believing his own ridiculous hype.

lol Fair would be the idea of abiding by a certain set system... In that yes I agree housemates should nominate if that is the system of BB. However, randomly introducing certain punishments one week and then either letting them lapse, or introducing a completely different random form of punishment the next is ludicrous. It's no secret to the majority on this Board, and the people who've been following the show, that BB organizers often pick favourites to win, and from the perspective of a lot of fans on here, the current line-up of dull, boring and unpopular housemates (like lisa who was a manipulator and a negative person at one stage) getting this far, is the result of inconsistent rules and inconsistent punishments. The problem a lot of Marcus/Freddie fans have with that eviction is that two other housemates blatantly broke the rules re this and were never punished (Sophie and Bea)... Instead of punishing these housemates..they changed the rule that week which would in fact only benefit them, since that was the week the bullying of Freddie was going on.
Additionally, the 'vote to save' was an oddly designed method of determining who would leave the week before.


If everything was consistent, no one would have a problem. But the combination of inter-chageable and random punishments that have only beneffited unpopular and mindlessly boring housemates. So no, we're not deluded. We just seem to be following things better than the likes of you, who would take all this at face value.