Notices

International Big Brother Big Brother around the world!

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-09-2009, 02:49 PM #7
Brekkie Brekkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BB Spy
Posts: 2,517

Favourites (more):
BBUSA16: Zach
BBCanada 2: Neda


Brekkie Brekkie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BB Spy
Posts: 2,517

Favourites (more):
BBUSA16: Zach
BBCanada 2: Neda


Default

[rquote=2515445&tid=145024&author=Tom]
How would 2 11 week series' at £60m be cheaper than 3 summer series' and January series' at £180 altogether? [/rquote]
First I'll mock your schoolboy error by saying obviously not.

Secondly, two series for £60m rather than three series plus extras for £180m is obviously cheaper. C4 would pay out £30m a year rather than £60m. They lose Celeb BB and a couple of weeks off the main show, but everyone agrees the main show would benefit from that.


Right back to the original question and considering this year BB cost £60m and bought in just £32m in ad revenue, there is an argument that C4 paying Endemol £30m not to have BB11 might have been value for money.
Brekkie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
bb11, channel 4

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts