[Combo]

Surely, after Siavash broke the rules like 3 times, Big Brother would of chucked him out? The constant rule breaking by Marcus etc?

I think Big Brother didn't want to throw hosuemates out because too many of them walked and ****? If housemates don't walk next year, maybe BB will chuck in some harsher punishments.

[Luanda]

I think the nomination process will change.

[dixiebell1991]

BB lost control, therefore BB was not BB which made the 'gameplay' stupid.
As in the essence of BB is in the control and monitoring of the people. Once the authority was lost the show lost its backbone. All the nonsense about not nominating was handled badly. Siavash should have been either given an official warning & then booted out. Or told straight: nominate in 2 mins or the door on the left is open. Goodybye. Finished.
Also the swearing and climbing on the wall by Marcus. Warnings should have been issued for the climbing and punishments for the swearing (not general swearing but for specific verbal attacks on BB that gave Marcus the impression he was a rebelling.)

[Luanda]

Agree 100% Dixie.

If you look at what the housemates did this year as opposed to BB1, where Nick went, there is no comparison.

[Shasown]

[rquote=2551812&tid=147071&author=dixiebell1991]BB lost control, therefore BB was not BB which made the 'gameplay' stupid.
As in the essence of BB is in the control and monitoring of the people. Once the authority was lost the show lost its backbone. All the nonsense about not nominating was handled badly. Siavash should have been either given an official warning & then booted out. Or told straight: nominate in 2 mins or the door on the left is open. Goodybye. Finished.
Also the swearing and climbing on the wall by Marcus. Warnings should have been issued for the climbing and punishments for the swearing (not general swearing but for specific verbal attacks on BB that gave Marcus the impression he was a rebelling.)
[/rquote]

Very true, however taking people out of the game for rule infringements would really have sunk them, BB were in a bit of a bind, the production team were at a loss as it was with the halfway stage walkers, Ken, Tom then Isaac . Unforeseen that all three would walk, one they could have coped with but three sort of threw them totally.

[MassiveTruck]

[rquote=2551770&tid=147071&author=Combo]Surely, after Siavash broke the rules like 3 times, Big Brother would of chucked him out? The constant rule breaking by Marcus etc?

I think Big Brother didn't want to throw hosuemates out because too many of them walked and ****? If housemates don't walk next year, maybe BB will chuck in some harsher punishments.
[/rquote]

It would have messed with the format and bringing new ones in was difficult.

They should have put him up for eviction against the first person he spoke to or something like that.

[RCW1945]

There was a major difference between Nick (BB1) and all others.
His was a deliberate and extended plan (using banned equipment - pencil and paper) intended to cause himself to win the prize-money.
It was clearly pre-planned shown by his desperate efforts to induce sympathy from the other HMs by the "dead fianceé tale".
All the others have come after boredom/claustrophobia has set in and were spontaneous acts with no ulterior motives.