[James]

Ever wondered what the producers liked about the BB3 housemates?

Confused? I know I am.

Anyway, Philip Edgar-Jones explains all to BBOnline.

http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bb...ost_bb3/23.htm

[splodge0]

I have said many times, it was Ch4 that messed BB3 up; this seems to confirm it.

I never had a problem with any of the HMs, only the format, the lack of meaningful tasks, that wretched divide with its even more wretchrd bars. The HMs are, after all what BB is all about.

Having seen what Endemol did with Fame Academy, it doesn't take much to see who should take responsability for BB3! ..... Channel beeping 4 !!!!!

[dizzy bint]

This is a very interesting article. I agree with you totally splodge. To see the housemates do almost nothing for weeks was very frustrating and boring. I think Channel 4 will certainly have to try harder next time.

I'd like to see a similar analysis by him of the BB2 contestants!!

[DLS]

And here I am, thinking that the powers that be simply chose either the most irritating, and most easily irritated people for the house. WHOOPS

[BusyBee]

I agree with you Splodge although I never really took to any of the BB3 housemates, what did my head in was the way the show was put together last year.

I am sure even our lovely BB2 lot would have been driven to distraction by the inactivity, lack of decent tasks, bars etc.

Would love to hear why they chose the BB2 lot, does anyone know if a similar article appeared about them.