[vesavius]

Originally Posted by AndyJK

To be fair to BB they can only show so much in the highlights.

Yes, and thats central to the point I am making, but its what they choose to show, and why, is whats being questioned here. Their choice of what to include is so selective and biased it amounts to a whitewash.


Why, do you think, honestly, they chose to not show the rest of the HM hearing the speakers revealing more of Ben's lies to them on the sofas, and the further fall out? In that Ben is revealed about having lied to them about being asked to do 'something nasty' to the group and they found out that he cost them their suitcases. It's a really important event in terms of the house.

There is no entertainment value in that? Ofc there this, it just didnt suit the obvious agenda and how they want people thinking.

Why show Shabby, for instance, having yet another (minor) tantrum instead, when thats ALL they show of her? Is that really entertaining? Really? or does it just suit their agenda for her?

I think the answer is obvious though.




No one is saying they should put out an hour of political debate, thats ridiculous, but if you had actually watched that debate in full then you would know that the snippets of it they chose didnt show Ben at all to be what he is, to the point of condoning the expensies abuse we have seen recently.

Instead they used it to present Nathan as a thugish bully (as is their agenda for him).

I'm not even a Nathan supporter, but it's just obvious. I am amazed that adults are even rationalising it.