[StGeorge]

Originally Posted by Shiner

Vote to evict when all HMs are up = controversial HMs (ones who inspire you pick up the phone) get evicted while boring HMs with smaller fanbases get through. The evidence is right there for you to see in last night's shock results. BB (and a few of us) knew this all along.
A vote to save would have meant that the HMs with the biggest fanbases (voting public) would have gone through to the final and been a threat to their chosen winner.

I disagree. Only when you have two HMs can this be true, as you then have an outright contest between a HMs fans and haters, which brings a true reflection of the worth of that HM to the public at large.

When there are multiply HMs in a VTS, then the odds are stacked in the favour of the HM with the large fanbase unless there is a well organised campaign to pick a certain A.N Other. Otherwise the haters get diluted by the multiple A.N. Others.

Simples.