[stoney]

Originally Posted by housemate

Hi Stoney .. thought I'd not comment on last night because I didn't want to be predictable....
however as I have been labelled a 'Dave Hater' by a number of his fans, I'll respond by saying that yes, I do hate the idea of him still being there and am entirely puzzled as to how he managed to be kept in, I get the unnerving feeling that something isn't adding up (percentages of votes?)
My hope now is that Dave does Win, because ultimately, the higher he climbs the harder he will fall.
I want to see Dave and his organisation thoroughly investigated. As a BB Winner. closer scrutiny of who he is and what he is all about will be inevitable. He isn't the usual everyday Winner who the Media have found it easy to all but ignore as in the past few years .. He has the potential to drag a lot of people into his 'belief system' ... I'm counting on the Press having a field day.
The most important question is whether Dave and his troops are the benign beings his supporters claim they are, or not, I'd like the facts either way and yes, I will apologise if I am found to be wrong .
PS .. In case anybody cares (lol) I had just written much the same as above in another 'venue' .. I haven't 'copied' anyone elses thoughts on the matter.

housemate....I wouldn't call you a dave hater.
I leave that badge to the ones who happily called themselves that in a dave hate thread a few days ago that have not shown face since sammy and jj1 got their butts kicked off the show

Unfortunately I couldn't care less about what any of the inmates do outside the show. I know I should but thats not why I watch this gameshow.

The simple reason dave is still in there is that he has been a good laugh a lot of the time in the house, despite the backbiting he has done.

I suspect that his "best offs" will be as long as Corin's,who, for me , was the only shocker last night, and probably one of the best of the season

As for press investigations into Dave and his church/cult/lot, I cant believe that if he is as bad as some make out that the papers have not already doen anything about it. They dont usually show as much restraint as they seem to be doing here