[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Holding a news conference at 3PM.

Thanks for that Iceman!

[mrscolumbo]

Pyramid - lets take the malice aforthought could be someone who was resentful/held a grudge or anger these emotions would imply someone near to Joanna - crime of passion again could be resentful/grudge/anger only done spare of the moment without thought or consequence and again by someone very close to Joanna.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by mrscolumbo

Pyramid - lets take the malice aforthought could be someone who was resentful/held a grudge or anger these emotions would imply someone near to Joanna - crime of passion again could be resentful/grudge/anger only done spare of the moment without thought or consequence and again by someone very close to Joanna.

That doesn't really answer the things that I asked though in response to your post earlier though, does it? Not that it matters, it's hardly as though you are obliged to answer or reply to anything and clearly you're unwilling to do that - no harm done!

It could any manner of things: from the downright obscure and offbeat reason - to a random burglary that went horribly wrong - to the boyfriend bumping her off. Which led onto the points I raised to you, in respect of your dismissal of the 'opportunist' angle, I asked why (and in many ways) you appear to be dismissing that - in favour of 'Crime of passion / pre-meditated'.

Personally, I'm not convinced it was. If it was pre-meditated, the killer surely would have thought of a far better hiding place for the body.

[mrscolumbo]

Pyramid - IMHO the culprit is male and was known to Joanna therefore indicating one or other of my theories also strangulation was the cause of death therefore indicationg that it was someone Joanna was happy to allow into her personal space.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by mrscolumbo

Pyramid - IMHO the culprit is male and was known to Joanna therefore indicating one or other of my theories also strangulation was the cause of death therefore indicationg that it was someone Joanna was happy to allow into her personal space.

Still no reply ref my many other questions...hay ho.

A male being statistically proven to be of the highest possibiities in any crime involving strangulation isn't really news breaking stuff really though. Statistically: given that she was strangled, the chances that the killer was a male are high.

Known to her? As much a possiblity as much as it may be a complete red herring - I did certainly have the initial thought at the beginning (and not only known, but a person VERY close to her), but now... mmmm.... not so sure at all.

****************************

News conference basically saying not a lot. Looks very much like the police have not a lot to be going on - I noted that it was stated by one of the reporters that CJ had been released on bail having been charged with NO crime. (ie: he is still being considered a suspect). Given what must be very scant info/evidence that the police have - I think it's pretty lame that he is still being labelled 'a suspect'.

Missing Pizza and wrapping - police 8/9 days into this are still unable to determine at this stage whether the pizza was eaten by Jo or not. Surely examining and determining the contents of a person's stomach can't be that time consuming....unless.... she did eat the pizza on Friday but didn't 'disappear' on the Friday - but disappeared after her body had digested and expelled the contents of her stomach, including said pizza.

Searching through 239tonnes of household rubbish - how many pizza boxes of this nature are purchased in this area? Presumably bar coding will allow them to determine if any boxes the found, allows the box to be deemed to be the one containing the pizza Joanna purchased?

Suddenly looking for a beige / light coloured 4x4. If so interested in this and thinking this may be linked to the crime: why is CJ still being considered - given that he does not have a 4 x 4 vehicle?

From where I am sitting: the police have absolutely nada. Or they are deliberately withholding info - as not a lot of this makes sense.

Curiouser and curiouser.